Co-investment deterrence
نویسندگان
چکیده
We examine co-investment and access in a model of new network deployment. show that the incumbent firm may find it optimal to deter by over-investing when cost-sharing rule is based on its verified expenditure information deployment cost asymmetric between operators regulator. When partial deterrence optimal, occurs areas intermediate attractiveness, consistently with evidence found other industries. A necessary sufficient condition for occur local industry profits are lower than without co-investment. Results robust demand uncertainty.
منابع مشابه
Optimal policy commitment: investment deterrence versus option value
The consistency and predictability of regulation is thought to be highly important for costly investment decisions. When the government lacks commitment power to maintain a promised policy, and firms are not perfectly competitive, investment levels are typically lower than when the government can commit. However, flexibility in policymaking is beneficial in that it allows for adjustment when co...
متن کاملOptimal co-investment in supply chain infrastructure
This paper considers co-investment in a supply chain infrastructure using an inter-temporal model. We assume that firms’ capital is essentially the supply chain’s infrastructure. As a result, firms’ policies consist in selecting an optimal level of employment as well as the level of co-investment in the supply chain infrastructure. Several applications and examples are presented and open-loop, ...
متن کاملResidual Deterrence ∗
Successes of law enforcement in apprehending offenders are often publicized events. Such events have been found to result in temporary reductions in offending, or “residual deterrence”. We provide a theory of residual deterrence which accounts for the incentives of both enforcement officials and potential offenders. Our theory rests on the costs of reallocating enforcement resources. In light o...
متن کاملBid deterrence
In a second-price auction with costly bidding, bidders can deter others from participating by publicly pre-committing to bid. Such “bid deterrence” increases total welfare when the reserve price is given, but allows the seller to increase expected revenue when the seller can pre-commit to a reserve price. JEL Codes: D44.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economics Letters
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1873-7374', '0165-1765']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110263